Which token standard fits your project?
The right token standard is the one supported by the chain, wallets, applications, and integrations your project intends to use. We begin with that destination and your token requirements, rather than treating standards as interchangeable templates.
ERC-20 is the common fungible-token interface on Ethereum-compatible networks. BEP-20 is used within the BNB Chain ecosystem. SPL is the token program standard used on Solana, while Jetton is the token model used on TON. Each has its own deployment path, tooling, and expectations for how token details are represented.
Before choosing, prepare answers to these questions:
- Which chain and network should hold the token at launch?
- Is the asset fungible, and what supply and decimal behavior do you require?
- Must supply be fixed, or does an authorized party need minting capability?
- Are transfer restrictions, pause controls, or administrative roles required?
- Which wallets, dApps, exchanges, or token directories matter for the initial release?
We turn those answers into a written scope for implementation and deployment. If the project needs custom logic beyond a standard token, it may be better scoped as smart contract development. Our broader Web3 development work can also cover the application around the token.
How does token deployment and verification work?
Deployment publishes the agreed token contract or configuration to the selected network; verification makes the relevant source information available through a supported block explorer. They are separate tasks, so the deployment plan should identify both before launch.
For an EVM token, deployment involves compiling the agreed contract with its settings, sending a deployment transaction, and recording the resulting address and transaction details. Where the explorer supports verification, source code and compiler settings must correspond to the deployed bytecode. On Solana and TON, the implementation and publishing steps follow their respective token tooling and metadata conventions rather than the EVM contract workflow.
We confirm the network, deployer permissions, token parameters, and any required metadata before publishing. After deployment, the handover identifies the token address or account, network, transaction reference, and remaining setup items. A reviewer can then compare the delivered details with the project specification.
Verification should not be confused with a security audit. If you need a separate review of custom logic, arrange it as its own workstream through smart contract development. For ecosystem visibility and profile submission after launch, see listings and verification.
What is included in token creation?
The project includes the agreed token implementation, deployment work, and handover; optional tasks are listed separately so there is no ambiguity about what the fee covers. Scope is confirmed after we understand the chain, features, and review requirements.
A typical delivery can include:
- A written token specification covering standard, supply, decimals, and administrative permissions.
- Contract or token configuration prepared for the agreed network.
- Deployment transaction execution and a record of the published address or account.
- Source verification support on an explorer where the chain and explorer provide a suitable process.
- Token name, symbol, and other agreed metadata prepared in the supported format.
- A handover describing deployment details, permissions, and the next operational steps.
The specification is the key control document. It should say who can mint, pause, or change settings, whether those powers can be removed, and how any initial supply is allocated. We will ask you to approve those choices before deployment rather than infer them from a short brief.
A website, dApp, wallet interface, audit, exchange listing, and ongoing token administration are not automatically part of token deployment. They can be scoped as separate services, including dApp development or Web3 website development.
How do we take a token from specification to handover?
The work moves from requirements to review, implementation, deployment, and handover. The schedule is agreed when the chain, feature set, and client approval path are known; a custom token or delayed approvals can add work compared with a straightforward standard implementation.
We use a gated process so key decisions are not left until a transaction is ready to publish:
- Discovery: You share the project purpose, target chain, token behavior, and intended integrations.
- Specification: We document the standard, supply, permissions, metadata, and deployment assumptions for your approval.
- Implementation: We prepare the contract or token configuration and check it against the approved scope.
- Deployment: Once you approve the parameters and provide required network access or funds, we publish to the agreed network.
- Verification and handover: We submit source information where applicable and provide the address, transaction record, and operational notes.
To keep reviews focused, send the preferred token name and symbol, supply model, decimals, admin wallet details, and metadata requirements together. Identify who can approve changes and who will control the deployment wallet. For application integrations, define the consuming product early; this helps prevent a token that is technically deployed but not ready for its intended use.
What token deployment can and cannot control
A token deployment can deliver the agreed on-chain implementation, but it cannot control how every explorer, wallet, or third-party directory displays or accepts it. The specific review and indexing rules of those services sit outside the deployment itself.
We can commit to the agreed implementation work, deployment transaction, and verification submission where that process is available. We cannot promise that an explorer will accept a submission, display metadata in a particular way, or process it on a particular schedule. Explorer verification checks whether submitted source information matches the deployed code; it does not certify that the contract is secure or that the project complies with every external service's requirements.
Before launch, use this review list:
- Confirm the deployment network and address with the team through a trusted channel.
- Review all privileged roles and the consequences of retaining or renouncing them.
- Test the intended token behavior and integrations before relying on them in production.
- Keep deployment records and wallet controls with the people responsible for operations.
- Treat audits, exchange acceptance, directory profiles, and market visibility as distinct work.
If your token is already live but its explorer profile or details need attention, profile remediation may be a more appropriate next step than redeployment. For broader platform submissions, compare the scope of listings and verification.
What should happen after the token goes live?
A live token is a technical milestone, not a complete launch plan. The next tasks depend on whether the project needs a product, community, token profile, or launch communications around the asset.
Start by confirming that the address and network are reflected consistently across your website, documentation, community channels, and any integrations. Publish the token's permissions and supply model in plain language so holders and partners can understand how it operates. Keep a record of who controls each administrative wallet and how changes are approved. If the token is intended to interact with a dApp, test that connection using the deployed address before directing users to it.
Then assign owners for ongoing work: technical maintenance, user questions, directory submissions, and launch communication. A token with a clear use case may need an application layer; a project aiming for wallet or directory discovery may need separate profile submissions. These are different workstreams and should be planned against actual project priorities, not bundled by assumption.
For a connected Telegram product, explore Telegram bot and mini app development. To coordinate release activity with communications and community work, review how we work and agree ownership before launch.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Token Development | from $490 / project |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Share the requirementsProvide the target chain, token purpose, supply model, permissions, metadata needs, and intended integrations.
- Approve the specificationReview the written scope and confirm the administrative roles and deployment assumptions before implementation.
- Build and reviewWe prepare the agreed contract or token configuration and check it against the approved requirements.
- Deploy to the selected networkAfter your approval and the required network access, we publish the token and record its address and transaction details.
- Verify and hand overWe support explorer verification where available and deliver the deployment record and operational notes.
Frequently asked questions
How much does token creation and deployment cost?
Token creation starts from $490 / project. The final scope depends on the chain, token features, metadata, verification needs, and whether the implementation requires custom logic. We confirm what is included before work begins.
How long does it take to create and deploy a token?
Timing is set after the chain and requirements are clear. A standard implementation can move through specification, approval, deployment, and handover without extended custom development; custom behavior, client review, and third-party verification processes affect the schedule.
Which chain should I choose for my token?
Choose based on the users, applications, wallets, and integrations you need to support. ERC-20 fits Ethereum-compatible ecosystems, BEP-20 is for BNB Chain, SPL is used on Solana, and Jetton is used on TON. Share your intended use and integrations so we can scope the right route.
Do you verify the token contract on an explorer?
We support source verification where the selected chain and explorer provide a process for it. For EVM verification, the submitted source and compiler settings need to match the deployed bytecode. Verification is separate from an independent security audit.
Can you guarantee that a wallet or directory will show my token?
No. We can deliver the agreed deployment and submit verification information where supported, but explorer review, indexing, metadata display, and directory acceptance are controlled by those services. Their rules and processing are not part of the on-chain deployment.
What do you need from me before starting?
Send the desired chain, token name and symbol, supply and decimals, required permissions, metadata, and intended integrations. You should also identify the deployment wallet and the person authorized to approve the specification and transaction.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…